Lyme Fraud Against Humanity

Welcome to Lyme Cryme - New Scientific Papers Added Weekly- Please Return and Pass This Site Along * Sign Petition * * FDA Meeting June 1994 * * Human Lyme Studies Without ABX Treatment * I - Lyme DiseaseTesting Failure II - Inaccuracy of Lyme Testing In Their Own Words III -Treatment Failure of Lyme Disease IV - Treatment Failure of Lyme Disease In Their Own Words V - Lymerix And Other Vaccine Controversy  VI - Borrelia- Cancer, Lymphoma VII - Borrelia - Spirochetes, And Alzheimers VIII - Borrelia and Multiple Sclerosis IX - Borrelia and ALS X - Borrelia and Lupus XI - Borrelia and HIV/AIDS XII - Borrelia And Carditis XIII - Borrelia and Gestational Lyme XIV - Borrelia and the Eye XV - Borrelia and the Brain * Kaiser-NY Medical College/Castle Connolly Medical * * Laboratories and History * * IDSA - TIMELINE OF CORRUPTION * * PATENTS * * Exposing the Truth * * * * View Presentation * * * * 1993 Congressional Hearing * *The Greatest Imitator*



 

 

 This site contains all actual/factual papers written by medical/scientific personnel

"Governance is needed because we are not
angels. On the other hand, because we are not governed by angels, government needs limits. There is no limit to medical governance. It is extremely bad policy. But we the people have allowed it. It is time that we the people stand up for ourselves and our well-being and make changes happen."
-James Madison

WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND

The health status of the entire World has been and continues to be compromised in several ways by combinations too powerful to be suppressed in the ordinary way.

In the early 70s chronic illness were not epidemic in our country unlike today with Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue, Lupus, MS, and ALS and many other debilitating illnesses that have been linked to Lyme Disease as you will see from papers on this web site. 

This Web Site contains published papers from both camps that show treatment failure and inaccurate testing. We therefore demand, both United States Houses of Congress to investigate Lyme Disease Diagnosis, Testing, and Treatment protocols currently under the Centers for Disease  Control, CDC, The Infectious Disease Society of America, IDSA, the American Medical Association, AMA, and the American Academy of Neurology. 

WE DEMAND JUSTICE

WE DEMAND TREATMENT

~*~

If after viewing the information on the web site you

understand that this is FRAUD WITH INTENT

TO DO HARM, Please sign the petition.

~ * ~

SCIENTIFIC FRAUD FOR PROSECUTION

The Lyme RICO (ALDF.com, et.al) made False Claims to the United States Government

1) Yale, et al, Falsifying the Diagnostic Standard for "Lyme Disease" in order to:

a) Falsify the Outcome of LYMErix (false claim to the FDA),
b) Deny Chronic, Persisting Borrelia, or Chronic Neurologic Lyme and the New Great Imitators on behalf of Kaiser-Permanente at New York Medical College/ALDF.com  (the RICO or the racket is the agreement between insurance companies and the patent holders to deny the existence of a disease until the vaccine is ready)

c) Set up the Monopoly on Blood (diseases and genetic susceptibilities to them) and
d) Deny that OspA actually caused the New Great Imitators or causes the Yuppie AIDS.

2) Deploying Psychiatry instead of IDSA's Scientifically Valid Biomarkers (research fraud or false claims) (This shows intent to cause harm.)

3) Mark Klempner and Arthur Weinstein and their Scientifically Invalid "Studies" and "Validations"-- These are bogus articles or research fraud.

4) Attacks (Color of Law Abuses): False Reports of Malpractice, False Arrests, Stalking, EdwardMcSweegan and Durland Fish's  Anonymous Internet Disinformation Campaign, Wiretapping, Harassment of Lyme and LYMErix victims.

___________________________~ * ~___________________________

1) CHARGE:  The Steere/European/Dearborn diagnostic standard is fraudulent and was meant to:

a) falsely qualify LYMErix and
b) set up a monopoly on what is in human blood (new diseases, genetic susceptibilities to diseases), since Yale's L2 Diagnostics, Imugen, and Corixa were to be the only ones qualified to test for VBDs after LYMErix was on the market.   LYMErix Western Blots were unreadable with the OspA-B plasmid in the standard borrelia.  The central RICO patent was US Patent 6,045,804.

Corixa did the majority of the advertising for Yale, Schoen and Allen Steere's monopoly.

1) Yale's Bb Flagellin Patent, 5.618,533 
2) Yale's LYMErix Patent, 5,747,294
3) Padula, UCONN, 5,620,862  Strain B31 used by Quest Labs = Low or No OspC or band 23 which is associated with brain invasion
4) CDC officer Alan Barbour and "Immune System is  Overhwhelmed," US Patent 6,719,983-
5) Tufts, Huber, 6,689,364 "LYMErix is a toxin"
6) Persing, Mayo Clinic, Monopoly Patent-6,045,804
7) CDC's patents with SmithKline in Europe which shows they know the Steere method is bogus. (Barbara Johnson of the CDC owns it with SmithKline.)
8) Barbour's flagella-less borrelia patent
9) 1996 B. theileri patent (Master's Disease is Cow Relapsing Fever) 
 Alan Barbour patent application for Master's Disease 5,932,220

 

DAMAGES:  Defrauding the FDA and the public about the new, Dearborn definition of Lyme increased the numbers of the permanent disabled who lost the opportunity for early detection (the racketeers did not use Yale' s US patent 5, 618, 533 method, which was valid per the FDA rules for validation), a lost opportunity for adequate discovery in why the HIV vaccine failed, and discovery as to why Lyme was the New Great Imitator: Pam3Cys-associated immune suppression or tolerance to fungal antigens (for TLR2), the resultant activation of latent viruses of all kinds (Multiple Sclerosis and cancers), and the tolerance-to-mycoplasma relationship to the onset of ALS.  NCI's and the US Army's  Paul Duray recognized and informed the ALDF/IDSA there was something wrong with the lymphocytes of chronic Lyme victims in 1989 (IDSA REVIEWS) and 1992 (Cold Spring Harbor meeting).


Gary Wormser knew that OspA vaccination suppressed the immune system but he still did not report this to the public or the FDA while this vaccine was still on the market.  He continued to pursue OspA as a vaccine through Baxter.

Gary Wormser reporting the blunting of the immune response in OspA vaccinated animals:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10865170?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

"OspA interferes with the response of lymphocytes to proliferative stimuli including a blocking of cell cycle phase progression."  

See more at
PAM3CYS IMMUNE SUPPRESSION

 If CDC & NIH officers were involved in these crimes (and they were *click* here to see) that's THEFT OF HONEST SERVICES

2) Biomarkers discovered by the racketeers, but not deployed by IDSA or Mark Klempner.  This includes all the data found in the 1989 IDSA Reviews, the ALS, cancer, and the MS data.  If Mark Klempner knew about the biomarkers but did not deploy them, while later stating that there were no such signs of delirium in chronic Lyme victims, that's scientific fraud, after delirium being stated as the reason for his MMPs studies, that's scientific FRAUD.  Everyone who declared that we Lyme victims were not sick but just CRAZY, who knew about these biomarkers, committed physical damages, death, permanent disability, slander, libel and perjury.

3) Mark Klempner's 2001 fraudulent "long term treatment" article is the basis of the IDSA phony "guidelines." 

This includes a charge of scientific fraud with intent to cause harm by deploying the non-scientific psychiatric persons to discredit us with their abuse, imaginary it's-all-in-your-head perjury, and doubly-brain damaging psychotropics.  It is malpractice to treat a real brain disease with CNS depressants, according to the American Psychiatric Association, as that makes the brain damage worse.  This is also libel, perjury and slander against Lyme victims and their treaters.

There are numerous instances of fraud in this Klempner article (see the next item), starting with Dearborn being knowingly a fraudulent standard by anyone's definition, to deliberately fraudulent use of "checklists," to determining outcomes, to the non-disclosure of which primers Klempner used. 

Specific to the Klempner crime, will be Arthur Weinstein's "Master Validator" contributions to it: the "validation" of the FIQ for Lyme, his phony  chromatography"detector," and his proposal that the "more antibodies makes the method more valid,." not to mention what he did at Dearborn and as regards his role in the ImmuLyme trial.

A) Weinstein "validating" the FIQ for Lyme:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10513489?ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

A real validation of a method requires that the method not detect two different analytes. 

B) Weinstein "validating" his own Dearborn concept that "more antibodies means more valid," which is the opposite of the FDA's rules on the validation of a method:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053960?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

This is supposedly a "validation" that only hypersensitivity responses or inflammatory responses could be considered disease processes, when all along stealth disablers would have the property of a time bomb or a Trojan Horse, or not be identified until later, as something else, like a New Great Imitator.

C) Weinstein comes up with his own kind of chromatography detector and claims to be responsible for teaching MDs how to do chromatography, which, if they were paying attention, would make the CT Separations Science Council (CSSC) laugh right out loud.

D) Weinstein was supposedly in charge of looking at the blots of the ImmuLyme-sick cases.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216

Supported by Pasteur Mérieux Connaught.

We are indebted to the members of the data and safety monitoring board: Arthur Weinstein, M.D. (chairman), George Washington School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.

When none of the Western Blots of OspA-vaccinated people were even readable, so we wonder how Weinstein could be in charge of such a group and not have ever looked at the "data," not to mention who threw out ImmuLyme's bad data (which would be, at least partially, Gary Wormser's responsibility and over which he was sued).

Now remember, through all of this, was Durland Fish, who is not a scientist, but a bug-catcher.  Fish was one of the original founding four of the ALDF.com. NIH's Edward McSweegan was Fish's tool and was apparently, the silent partner among the founding three- John J. Connolly, Gary Wormser and Durland Fish.

The racketeers self-revealed themselves.  

E)  Weinstein's Central Role at Dearborn, the scene of the crime.

You can see that that is all fictitious, since, in fact, this clique warped the FDA "Methods Validations" definitions (see FDA rules for validation), and none of the labs agreed at all with the Dressler/Steere recommendation (This was told to the FDA Vaccine Committee in January, 2001. See:  http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf)

No one agreed with Steere's proposal at Dearborn and the Dressler/Steere prospective study showed only 39/54 of the ARTHRITIS patients had anything close to Steere's hypersensitivity, "more antibodies is more valid," proposal. 

Weinstein was at the scene in every part of the crime, playing the role of the "validator."

4) a) The Patents tell a different story, and b) and the Primer Shell Game.

Mark Klempner never published which DNA or RNA primers he used to determine "No Lyme" in chronic Lyme victims, while simultaneously throwing out cases that were positive after treatment in his "long-term treatment" "study."  Meanwhile Gary Wormser et al have demonstrated that they know what DNA and RNA primers to use when they want to find borrelial DNA or RNA in ticks.  So, to ever thence, since 1992, use OspA primers to determine "Lyme," when they use flagellin and RNA primers to find "borrelia" in humans, is FRAUD.

This report shows that Gary Wormser has known since 1992 which primers to used to detect borrelia:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=270592&blobtype=pdf

This report shows that Robert Schoen has known since 1995 which primers to use to detect borrelia:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914

This is also the report that goes with the Persing RICO or the Persing monopoly patent
5)
Persing, Mayo Clinic, Monopoly Patent-6,045,804

6) Brain-Permanent;  all the persistence past treatment or treatment failure articles by the crooks, of which there are over 20.  This despite IDSA/ALDF claims that Lyme is "easily diagnosed and cured" and that "there is no such thing as chronic Lyme" is self explanatory.

All the older data on Relapsing Fever also says it is incurable and goes into a cyst form.

IDSA's Russell Johnson says the cyst form may take months to reconstitute into tact spirochetes in BSK media.  That would be because the Mouse Infectivity test would be better, and all the IDSA racketeers know it.

The American Psychiatric Association's Guidelines on the Treatment of a Delirium make it double malpractice to treat Lyme brain with psychotropics since all psychotropics are brain damaging in and of themselves.

The crime should be charged by the Department of Justice as a RICO because Yale knew they could not read their Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people in 1995, as demonstrated by Yale's Robert Schoen crime, as well as false claims to the United States or Qui Tam:

1) Schoen on the unreadable Western Blots in 1995
2) Schoen instructing MDs to just ignore LYMErix vaccine injury or failure cases in 1998.

Schoen never told anyone he could not read his Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people.  He especially did not tell the FDA. Schoen also was involved in the development of the RICO method:

The Lyme criminals could not even read their Western Blots in LYMErix or ImmuLyme-vaccinated people, yet they claimed to have used the Dearborn Method to assess their vaccines outcomes:

Here are those 4 "we can't read our OspA vaccine results" reports:

SCHOEN and PERSING, with JOHN ANDERSON,1996 - the RICO report:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914

SCHOEN AND PERSING IN THEIR 1996 RICO METHOD PATENT:
The Dave Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD Patent-6,045,804

PERSING WITH SIGAL EXPLAINING THAT THE WESTERN BLOTS WERE UNREADABLE, 2000:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920

Yale's ROBERT SCHOEN in the 1998 Munchausen's Book, instructing MDs to blow off LYMErix systemically injured people ("but send the post-vaccination blood to the Yale L2 Diagnostics lab").

This is a FALSE CLAIM or a QUI TAM or FRAUD on the GOVERNMENT:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00921.htm

Yale, Schoen, et.al knew they could not read their Western Blots in LYMErix-vaccinated people, but they wanted all the national bloodwork sent to their labs (L2 Diagnostics and PolyGenomics), so they could patent, and pharm, and be the only ones with access to the new vector borne diseases to patent, and be the only ones with access to - nationally - genetic information about disease susceptibilities (this has bioweapons applications).
 

The 1998 Vaccines Reports (ImmuLyme and LYMErix):

LYMErix results (76% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/209

ImmuLyme results (92% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216 

From the LYMErix trial, "categories of outcomes:"
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content-nw/full/339/4/209/T1

 

_______________~ * ~_______________

During the week of April 20th, 2009 the petition, your petition(comments only) and the Lyme Cryme Presentation Overview was delivered by U.S. Mail to the office of the President of the United States, Barack Obama, several states Attorneys General and many members of the Department of Justice around the United States.

~*~

The Lyme Cryme website is an ongoing project, so please check back for updates and new added peer reviewed articles.

~*~

   This is a global petition and is not restricted to USA residents.

  We encourage you to leave a comment. 

---  SIGN PETITION HERE  --- 

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/LymeCryme/index.html

The petition is free to sign, you can leave

your name or be anonymous*

We undertake to honor or exceed the legal requirements of medical information privacy that applies to the different areas of the world. See "Data Protection" in disclaimer.

Thank you

~ * ~

 

 

The Dearborn Conference

"How the Test was Spun"

 

 

"Concerned Citizens" Disclaimer:

Funding for this website comes from ordinary citizens and

no one profits off of any part of this site.

The information provided on this site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.

Information presented on this website is considered public information (unless otherwise noted) and may be distributed or copied. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credit is requested. Write to: ConcernedCitizens@lymecryme.com

Some of the documents on this server may contain live references (or pointers) to information created and maintained by other organizations. Please note that the group of "Concerned Citizens" who compiled the Lyme Cryme website does not control and cannot guarantee the relevance, timeliness, or accuracy of these outside materials.

For site security purposes and to ensure that this service remains available to all users, this computer system employs software programs to monitor network traffic to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or change information, or otherwise cause damage. Unauthorized attempts to upload information or change information on this website are strictly prohibited and may be punishable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act.

Data Protection
.
The right to protection of personal data is a fundamental right. It is different from, but closely linked to, the right to respect for private and family life. This distinction is made, inter alia, in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights - which mentions the two rights separately, although next to each other in Articles 7 and 8.
.
Data protection is highly developed in the EU. The central piece of legislation is Directive 95/46, which regulates the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data. Implemented into national laws, the Directive applies to all EU Member States as well as to Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.
.
Regulation 45/2001 lays down the same rights and obligations on the level of the EC institutions and bodies. It also establishes the EDPS as independent supervisory authority with the task of ensuring that the Regulation is complied with.
.
Citizens who feel that their rights have been infringed should contact the competent data protection authority, at national or European level. As this is a specialised field, some useful information is available in the glossary, and the Q&A section of this website. This may also be helpful for those who want to know more about the obligations they need to comply with.
.
.http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/site/mySite/pid/15

Information may also be used for authorized law enforcement investigations.

Comments or Questions: ConcernedCitizens@lymecryme.com

-Sharing information is Priceless- 

Website sponsored by Concerned Citizens

 Webpage Last Modified: 2009-11-10  06:49:30

35255